Save the Basin Reserve!

Let’s Get Wellington Moving: give your views on four mass transit and State Highway 1 options by Friday 10 December
- 6 Dec 2021
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Let’s Get Wellington Moving: time to give your views on four mass transit and State Highway 1 options that affect the Basin Reserve precinct Six years after the Basin Reserve flyover proposal was finally defeated in the High Court, Let’s Get Wellington Moving has announced four options for mass rapid transit and State Highway One […]
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 36 months ago by feedreader
- Tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- consultation
- lets-get-wellington-moving

Save The Basin’s March 2021 Briefing For Transport Minister Michael Wood
- 24 May 2021
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- With the big Let’s Get Wellington Moving decisions on Wellington’s transport future expected later this year, it’s time to review how we got here and look ahead.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 42 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign recommends four Wellington mayoral candidates
- 1 Oct 2020
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign today named its preferred candidates for Wellington Mayor and other local body positions, based on responses received to a survey sent to all candidates.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 50 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign 2019 AGM and Guest Speaker Hugh Tennent
- 31 Oct 2019
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- You’re warmly invited to the Save the Basin 2019 AGM on Tuesday 12 November, doors open 5.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 61 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign recommends four Wellington mayoral candidates
- 1 Oct 2019
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign today named its preferred candidates for Wellington Mayor and other local body positions, based on responses received to a survey sent to all candidates.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 50 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign recommends four Wellington mayoral candidates
- 1 Oct 2019
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign today named its preferred candidates for Wellington Mayor and other local body positions, based on responses received to a survey sent to all candidates.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 50 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign recommends four Wellington mayoral candidates
- 1 Oct 2019
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign today named its preferred candidates for Wellington Mayor and other local body positions, based on responses received to a survey sent to all candidates.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 50 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Basin Reserve Precinct Transport Plans – Latest Diagrams, Details and Technical Papers Released
- 9 Jul 2019
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- For a long time, since the final defeat of the previous Basin Reserve flyover proposal in 2015, all we’ve had to go on are private assurances that whatever plans eventually emerged would not include a new Basin Reserve flyover.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 65 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Wellington Transport Announcements: The Big Picture Looks Promising, But The Details Are Murky
- 16 May 2019
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Save the Basin Campaign spokesperson Tim Jones today congratulated the Let’s Get Wellington Moving project partners on the positive aspects of today’s Wellington transport announcement, but said that many questions remained about the detailed plans for the Basin Reserve and the Basin Reserve precinct.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 67 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign Inc. Position Statement 2019
- 25 Mar 2019
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Board of Inquiry findings must be respected and followed We believe that the findings of both the Board of Inquiry into the Basin Bridge Proposal Decision in August 2014 and the High Court Appeal Decision against the Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Basin Bridge in August 2015 must be respected and adhered to.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Zero fossil fuel powered vehicles in Wellington City by 2040: Councillor Roger Blakeley’s presentation to the 2018 Save the Basin Campaign AGM
- 3 Dec 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- (Note: The view expressed in this presentation are Councillor Blakeley’s personal and professional views, not those of Greater Wellington Regional Council) by Tim Jones Another year has gone by, and we still don’t know what will be in the Let’s Get Wellington Moving Recommended Programme of Investment – in other words, the Ngauranga to Airport transport plan that we’ve been awaiting for the last three years. It often seems as though the whole thing will end up as a messy political compromise. But what if the guiding principles were such things as: making Wellington liveable making Wellington fair, safe and healthy making Wellington beautiful, vibrant and culturally rich? And what if, in place of Let’s Get Welly Moving’s continued refusal to treat the climate change impact of its plans as a key or even important factor, a central goal of their work was to ensure zero greenhouse gas emissions from Wellington transport by 2040? Does that sound like a pipe dream? It isn’t. Because Councillor Roger Blakeley, with input from a number of people with community expertise in Wellington transport, has come up with a plan to do all that and more. And he presented it to the 2018 Save the Basin Campaign Annual General Meeting: Essentials of a 21st Century Transport Strategy We encourage you to read it. We encourage you to think about it. And we encourage you to support it – or, if you wish, suggest further improvements. It’s great to see one of our elected representatives engaging in detail with the work that needs to be done to make Wellington a city fit for its residents – and fit for the future. Thanks, Roger!
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Tagged as:
- electric-vehicles

Save the Basin Campaign Inc. 2018 AGM, Thursday 22 November: “Essentials of a 21st Century Transport Strategy” and Panel Discussion
- 8 Nov 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign Inc.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign: Basin Reserve Confusion And Mixed Transport Messages Weaken Welcome Light Rail News
- 29 Sep 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign has welcomed elements of the “Let’s Get Wellington Moving” Wellington transport plans revealed last night, especially the news that light rail is to be included as a priority element of those plans.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Let’s Get Wellington Moving: a case study of the failure to apply adequate cost-benefit analysis that includes climate change and other health costs
- 14 Aug 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Guest post by Liz Springford This case study from Liz’s Productivity Commission Low Emissions Economy submission is a powerful critique of LGWM’s failure to apply adequate cost-benefit analysis that includes climate change and other health costs.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Taking The Wheel: The Government Makes More Moves To Rebalance Transport
- 3 Jul 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- As Wellington waits for an announcement in its transport future, the Government is continuing to make moves to reshape transport in New Zealand away from over-reliance on the private car and towards a balanced system that gives as many people as possible options for getting off the roads: The new Government Policy Statement on Land Transport represents a significant change away from the previous Government’s motorway-dominated transport priorities, as Isabella Cawthorn explains on Talk Wellington. On Newshub, Thomas Coughlan says that public transport is the big winner in the new strategy. The previous National-led Government was completely impervious to the well-accepted research finding that adding new capacity encourages more people into cars. The news that the Government is considering tolling Transmission Gully to help prevent this is an encouraging sign that the feared flood of additional cars into Wellington from the North may not materialise. While we wait to see whether the Government’s new, balanced approach will succeed in cutting Wellington’s motorway-building cabal off at the pass, why not find out how another seaside city, Vancouver, has succeeded in making its transport system work for people, not the other way around?
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Tagged as:
- transmission-gully

Transportation 2040: Vancouver’s Blueprint for Sustainable Transport, with lessons for Wellington: Wednesday 4 July, 6:30-7:30pm
- 25 Jun 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Date, Time and Venue Wednesday 4 July, 6:30-7:30pm Sustainability Trust, 2 Forresters Lane, Te Aro (off Tory St) Who: Hosted by Congestion-Free Wellington What’s This About? Wellington is facing major transport and land-use choices as we decide on the Let’s Get Wellington Moving process.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Tired Motorway Sales Pitch Falls Flat, Says Save The Basin Campaign
- 15 Jun 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The leaked transport proposals for Wellington read like a sales pitch gone badly wrong, said Save the Basin Campaign spokesperson Tim Jones.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 78 months ago
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign Congratulates Wellington City Council
- 10 May 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Save the Basin Campaign applauds Wellington City Council’s proposal to save the historic Basin Reserve Museum Stand.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 79 months ago
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

A possible Basin Reserve flyover has emerged again in a new “surprise survey” from LGWM
- 5 May 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign Inc has written the following letter in response to the new Let’s Get Welly Moving “surprise survey” which LGWM chose not to notify stakeholder groups, such as Save the Basin, about: The STBC, as a stakeholder group in the LGWM consultation process, takes strong issue with your organisation on a number of matters in relation to the existence of this survey: The survey has taken everyone at STBC by complete surprise. What is the purpose of the survey and who has it been distributed to? There was no prior notification to STBC (as a stakeholder) that LGWM would be commissioning the survey and it was only by chance that a member of the STBC committee was alerted to its existence. This is alarming and shows a complete lack of transparency and questions the validity of the survey. The process for public engagement on the LGWM scenarios closed in November last year – and in March this year LGWM released the summary of the feedback process on future transport scenarios for Wellington. Your website currently says “We’re using the feedback from the November 2017 public engagement to help guide our work as we develop a recommended programme of investment.” However, you continue to be asking for more views and ideas through this latest survey – with no information about this available to the public through your website. Of great concern is the fact the survey implies that a bridge/fly-over around the Basin Reserve is still an option – especially in the way the questions are constructed and presented. For example in relation to design, one survey respondent said that the preferences for infrastructure around the Basin gave options for a bridge or tunnel on one page – suggesting that there were only two options – then on the next page the last part of this question appeared offering an at grade option. Although we are not circulating the survey to our members to complete, we know that others who have been alerted to the survey may. If the survey was designed to be filled in by certain individuals or organisations, either targeted or randomly selected, the results will be invalidated if others complete it. No-one should trust the results of this survey. We would appreciate a response to this email. [etc]
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 79 months ago
- Tagged as:
- consultation

Submit by Wednesday 2 May: Let the Government know you support the new draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) on Land Transport
- 21 Apr 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The draft Government Policy Statement is a very significant change from the previous Government’s motorway-dominated policies – the policies that led to the now-defeated Basin Reserve flyover proposal.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 80 months ago
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign Media Release: It’s Time To Go Forwards, Not Backwards, On Wellington Transport
- 13 Mar 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign today called on the Government, Wellington City Council and Greater Wellington to go forwards, not backwards, on Wellington transport.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 81 months ago
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign Inc. Submission On The Regional Land Transport Plan Mid-Term Review
- 12 Mar 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- While we wait to see what emerges from the Let’s Get Welly Moving engagement process that was held just before Christmas 2107, other transport planning processes are continuing.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 81 months ago
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign Inc. Submission To Let’s Get Welly Moving
- 22 Jan 2018
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Below is the Save the Basin Campaign (STBC) submission to the Let’s Get Welly Moving (LGWM) engagement process on its four proposed scenarios for Wellington transport.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 82 months ago
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Submission Guide: Let’s Get Welly Moving (LGWM) Scenarios – Submissions Close 15 December 2017
- 29 Nov 2017
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Short Version Got five minutes? Read this and submit now! Let’s Get Welly Moving (LGWM) still wants to build a motorway flyover (which they call a bridge) at the Basin Reserve! LGWM has released four scenarios.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Save the Basin Campaign appalled that Basin Reserve flyover plans remain on the table
- 15 Nov 2017
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The Save the Basin Campaign has said that aspects of the new Wellington transport plans unveiled today “feel like a slap in the face of the new Government”.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Let’s Get Wellington Moving to reveal its plans for the Basin Reserve – this Wednesday, 15/11, 6.30pm – at Prefab, 14 Jessie St, Te Aro
- 10 Nov 2017
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- This is it.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Now With Speaker Details: Public Meeting: For A More Liveable Wellington, Monday 28 August
- 22 Aug 2017
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- Our speakers are: Roger Blakeley: Introduction – Let’s Get Welly Moving’s principles and objectives Paula Warren: The sustainable transport hierarchy and why LGWM’s outcomes should reflect it Barry Mein (LGWM): LGWM’s progress towards meeting its objectives Russell Tregonning: Transport, climate change and public health: transport choices are health choices When: Monday 28 August, doors open 5.30pm, 6pm sharp start, 7.30pm close Where: Wellington Central Library, Mezzanine Floor Meeting Room All welcome to hear how sustainable transport design for Wellington benefits everyone—walkers, cyclists, public transport users, and drivers—reducing traffic volumes, lowering carbon emissions, and making a healthier city. Doors open 5.30 for 6pm sharp start. We’ll hear from our speakers, then have a panel discussion, with time for one-on-one discussions afterwards. Facebook event.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Tagged as:
- libraries

Public Meeting: For A More Liveable City, Monday 28 August
- 8 Aug 2017
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- When: Monday 28 August, doors open 5.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Forum to canvass Wellington Transport and Energy issues Thursday 27th July 5.30pm to 7pm
- 19 Jul 2017
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- A forum to canvass Wellington Transport and Energy issues Thursday 27th July 5.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 68 months ago by feedreader
- Automatically tagged as:
- basin-reserve
- basin-reserve-flyover
- lobby-groups
- cricket

Sore Losers: Nick Smith and the Government Water Down the Environmental Legal Assistance Fund
- 7 Jul 2017
- Save the Basin Reserve!
- The rules of the Ministry for the Environment’s Environmental Legal Assistance Fund, which groups including Save the Basin have used to help fund legal challenges to infrastructure projects, have now been changed so that such applications can be arbitrarily declined, by: The inclusion of a new criterion to consider whether providing ELA funding to the applicant for its involvement in the legal proceedings, will contribute to impeding or delaying the ability of people and communities to provide for their social, economic and cultural well-being in relation to important needs, including employment, housing and infrastructure. I was rung by a Stuff journalist about this and responded on behalf of Save the Basin: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/94323541/quiet-change-to-public-fund-for-environmental-legal-challenges A subsequent exchange in Question Time (see below) makes it very clear that Nick Smith had the Government’s Basin Reserve flyover defeat in mind when he made this move. Nick Smith and the Government appear to think that fits of pique make good public policy. We beg to differ. Question Time 9. EUGENIE SAGE (Green) to the Minister for the Environment: By how much has annual funding for the Environmental Legal Assistance Fund been cut since 2013/14? Hon Dr NICK SMITH (Minister for the Environment): The budget this year is $600,000 per year, as it was last year and the year before. For the 4 years prior to that the budget was $800,000 per year but was repeatedly underspent. The spend in 2013-14 was $555,000, and the average actual spend was $520,000. As much as I like the Minister of Finance, I do not like under-spending my vote so I reduced the budget in 2015-16 and transferred it to increased support for collaborative processes. This is also consistent with our blue-green philosophy of supporting people to find solutions rather than spending it on legal aid to fight disputes. Eugenie Sage: Can he confirm that he created a new criterion for the fund recently so that community groups wanting to challenge council decisions in the courts are likely to be denied funding if their case might “impede or delay” a development project? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: Yes, I have changed the criteria. A new consideration is the issue of housing and infrastructure. The Government makes no apologies for making it harder for groups to get Government money to stop houses and infrastructure from being built. It does not prevent funding being provided in those sorts of cases, but it requires the panel to give consideration to the broader public interest. It simply does not make sense for the Government to be using public money to stop transport projects being built and stop houses being built with legal aid funding. Eugenie Sage: Does he believe that Forest & Bird would have received funding to mount a legal challenge to Bathurst Resources’ proposed coalmine on the Denniston plateau if this new criterion had been in place? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: There is an independent panel that makes the decisions on the issue of the legal aid. What I have added to the criteria is that, alongside the environmental things, issues like infrastructure, jobs, and housing have to be a consideration. But it still will be an independent consideration for the panel. Eugenie Sage: Can he confirm that last year he gave himself the power to decide which cases and which community groups would get environmental legal aid, stripping this power away from the Ministry for the Environment’s chief executive? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: Each year Ministers make a decision about the level of delegations. In this particular case, I decided not to delegate to the Ministry for the Environment, albeit I note that I followed the panel’s advice in every case. In the event that I do not follow the panel’s advice it will be a matter of open public record. Eugenie Sage: Why will he not just own the fact that his Government is trying to stop legal challenges that might impede environmentally destructive development, like the coalmine on the Denniston plateau, the Ruataniwha Dam, and the Basin Reserve flyover? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: I know of many Wellingtonians who would be concerned that the Government was spending money on stopping roading through to the airport being constructed with legal aid funds. So the Government has deliberately put into the environmental legal aid criteria that the panel needs to consider issues like infrastructure and housing. To quote the Minister for Infrastructure: “We are the infrastructure Government.”, and we want to see New Zealanders being able to get around and have a roof over their heads.9. EUGENIE SAGE (Green) to the Minister for the Environment: By how much has annual funding for the Environmental Legal Assistance Fund been cut since 2013/14? Hon Dr NICK SMITH (Minister for the Environment): The budget this year is $600,000 per year, as it was last year and the year before. For the 4 years prior to that the budget was $800,000 per year but was repeatedly underspent. The spend in 2013-14 was $555,000, and the average actual spend was $520,000. As much as I like the Minister of Finance, I do not like under-spending my vote so I reduced the budget in 2015-16 and transferred it to increased support for collaborative processes. This is also consistent with our blue-green philosophy of supporting people to find solutions rather than spending it on legal aid to fight disputes. Eugenie Sage: Can he confirm that he created a new criterion for the fund recently so that community groups wanting to challenge council decisions in the courts are likely to be denied funding if their case might “impede or delay” a development project? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: Yes, I have changed the criteria. A new consideration is the issue of housing and infrastructure. The Government makes no apologies for making it harder for groups to get Government money to stop houses and infrastructure from being built. It does not prevent funding being provided in those sorts of cases, but it requires the panel to give consideration to the broader public interest. It simply does not make sense for the Government to be using public money to stop transport projects being built and stop houses being built with legal aid funding. Eugenie Sage: Does he believe that Forest & Bird would have received funding to mount a legal challenge to Bathurst Resources’ proposed coalmine on the Denniston plateau if this new criterion had been in place? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: There is an independent panel that makes the decisions on the issue of the legal aid. What I have added to the criteria is that, alongside the environmental things, issues like infrastructure, jobs, and housing have to be a consideration. But it still will be an independent consideration for the panel. Eugenie Sage: Can he confirm that last year he gave himself the power to decide which cases and which community groups would get environmental legal aid, stripping this power away from the Ministry for the Environment’s chief executive? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: Each year Ministers make a decision about the level of delegations. In this particular case, I decided not to delegate to the Ministry for the Environment, albeit I note that I followed the panel’s advice in every case. In the event that I do not follow the panel’s advice it will be a matter of open public record. Eugenie Sage: Why will he not just own the fact that his Government is trying to stop legal challenges that might impede environmentally destructive development, like the coalmine on the Denniston plateau, the Ruataniwha Dam, and the Basin Reserve flyover? Hon Dr NICK SMITH: I know of many Wellingtonians who would be concerned that the Government was spending money on stopping roading through to the airport being constructed with legal aid funds. So the Government has deliberately put into the environmental legal aid criteria that the panel needs to consider issues like infrastructure and housing. To quote the Minister for Infrastructure: “We are the infrastructure Government.”, and we want to see New Zealanders being able to get around and have a roof over their heads.
- Accepted from Save the Basin posts 56 months ago by feedreader
- Tagged as:
- water
- government
- airport
- wellington
- art
- housing
- sport
- people

Related Tags

Tags

Save the Basin Reserve! newsitems

Feeds

Archive

Discovered Feeds

Latest Newsitems