<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Architectural Centre Inc and Government</title>
    <link>https://wellington.gen.nz/architectural-centre-inc+government</link>
    <description>Items tagged with Architectural Centre Inc and Government.</description>
    <item>
      <title>WCC voted on Dec 5 to demolish the City to Sea Bridge</title>
      <link>https://architecture.org.nz/2024/12/10/wcc-voted-on-dec-5-to-demolish-the-city-to-sea-bridge/</link>
      <description>Supporting the Wellington Civic Trust, the Architectural Centre will be opposing this decision through whatever means we can. We believe the Council’s advice to Councillors was not provided with reasonable consideration of the range of development options, particularly considering physical and cultural amenity value of the bridge. The demolition of the Bridge will return the […]</description>
      <category>city-to-sea-bridge</category>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://architecture.org.nz/2024/12/10/wcc-voted-on-dec-5-to-demolish-the-city-to-sea-bridge/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <georss:point>-41.28871245 174.77854018809037</georss:point>
      <georss:featurename>City to Sea Bridge, Te Aro, Wellington, Wellington City, Wellington, New Zealand</georss:featurename>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Response to WCC evaluation</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2013/03/19/response-to-wcc-evaluation/</link>
      <description>The WCC has issued a report which evaluates Alternatives to the NZTA’s proposal for a flyover at the Basin. Download a PDF to read our response to the WCC report. Arch-Centre_Response to WCC report</description>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>basinreserve</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>transport</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2013/03/19/response-to-wcc-evaluation/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <georss:point>-41.30037055 174.7802503270504</georss:point>
      <georss:featurename>Basin Reserve, Dufferin Street, Mount Victoria, Wellington, Wellington City, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand</georss:featurename>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mitigation</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2013/03/06/mitigation/</link>
      <description>In the case of the Basin Reserve flyover, the Wellington City Council has asked for further “mitigation” of the proposed Flyover (concrete bridge / Option A). For its part, NZTA has also promised some “mitigation” of the effects of the flyover, and says that they will focus on “mitigation” to ensure that the flyover is “integrated”. Trouble is, I’m not really sure that they are talking about the same thing.</description>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>basinreserve</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>transport</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2013/03/06/mitigation/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <georss:point>-41.30037055 174.7802503270504</georss:point>
      <georss:featurename>Basin Reserve, Dufferin Street, Mount Victoria, Wellington, Wellington City, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand</georss:featurename>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Light Rail could be Cheap as Chips!</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2012/03/21/light-rail-could-be-cheap-as-chips/</link>
      <description>Following stunning news today from the GWRC study into the cost of a possible Light Rail system in Wellington – results have come back that the cost COULD be as LOW as $14m per km.</description>
      <category>light-rail</category>
      <category>regional-council</category>
      <category>trains</category>
      <category>transport</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2012/03/21/light-rail-could-be-cheap-as-chips/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>City Barriers</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2012/01/17/city-barriers/</link>
      <description>Timber posts with nautical rope strung between them are being proposed for segments of the Manners Mall in Wellington, in an effort to stop people crossing the road ‘illegally’. The proposal is by a WCC Councilor, Leonie Gill, who appears shocked and horrified that Wellingtonians have such a care-free attitude to crossing the road.</description>
      <category>manners-mall-bus-lane</category>
      <category>transport</category>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>bus-lanes</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2012/01/17/city-barriers/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wgtn 2040</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/06/27/wgtn-2040/</link>
      <description>The Wellington City Council has at last started the process of telling you about WGTN 2040, the proposed Vision for the future – 29 years in the future to be exact.&#xD;
&#xD;
It has been a long time coming – a couple of years at least, but this is one of the most important consultations that the Council has ever asked the Wellington public for their opinion on. We would encourage all Wellingtonians to have some input on this – and we would also like to hear your views, so that we can also table a submission from the Architectural Centre.</description>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>consultation</category>
      <category>planning</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>issues</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/06/27/wgtn-2040/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png" />
      </media:content>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>skyline reservations</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/06/21/skyline-reservations/</link>
      <description>Last week news of a proposed hotel development on the site of the Skyline Restaurant at the top of the cable car appeared on the front page of the Dominion Post.  The article had salacious details of ‘clandestine dealings’, ‘contractual agreements’, the public and media banned from meetings behind closed doors at WCC and a proposal to revoke the reserve status of an area of the Botanic Gardens to allow for a hotel on the site.</description>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>kelburn</category>
      <category>skyline-hotel</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>places</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/06/21/skyline-reservations/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png" />
      </media:content>
      <georss:point>-41.289205 174.7623927</georss:point>
      <georss:featurename>Kelburn, Wellington, Wellington City, Wellington, New Zealand/Aotearoa</georss:featurename>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deep water</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/05/29/deep-water/</link>
      <description>The WCC Draft Annual Plan 2011/12 was out for public consultation recently. In these tight financial times the plan was generally about maintaining affordable rates through prioritising spending and reducing costs by $6 million, through reducing some services, improving the efficiency of other services and deferring non-urgent work. Although it’s not all cost cutting, there is an allowance to spend $650,000 on a feasibility study for a new deep-water pool in Kilbirnie.</description>
      <category>kilbirnie</category>
      <category>consultation</category>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>swimming</category>
      <category>places</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>sport</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/05/29/deep-water/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png" />
      </media:content>
      <georss:point>-41.3166456 174.7980932</georss:point>
      <georss:featurename>Kilbirnie, Wellington, Wellington City, Wellington, New Zealand/Aotearoa</georss:featurename>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On your books</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/01/27/on-your-books/</link>
      <description>In the mean time - here’s a round up on projects completing, underway, or even just starting off, as there a couple of new cranes that have appeared over Christmas.&#xD;
&#xD;
The big push around Wellington at the moment is of course the Housing Upgrade Project. A number of well-respected practices around town have got a project or two in there - with a total of about 20 WCC housing projects to upgrade, we’re guessing there is some work in there to last for a few years</description>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>housing</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>issues</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2011/01/27/on-your-books/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png" />
      </media:content>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another restructure - Should we care?</title>
      <link>http://architecture.org.nz/2010/03/19/another-restructure-should-we-care/</link>
      <description>It’s inevitable, given their political nature, that governments (local and central) are subject to “restructuring” more than most institutions.  Anyone involved in architecture and urban design in Wellington will have known, for a little while now, that the urban design bits of our city council have been, and are in the middle of, such [...]</description>
      <category>wcc</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>communitygroups</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://architecture.org.nz/2010/03/19/another-restructure-should-we-care/</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architectural Centre Inc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://cards.eelpieconsulting.co.uk/thumbnail?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchitecture.org.nz%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fdefault%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Fthumb-standard.png" />
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
